Deconstructed PACS – It’s not all bad news
Published: August 24, 2016
The successful adoption and use of PACS was for many years a much-coveted aspect of radiology. As an early adopter of healthcare IT far ahead of other specialties, radiology was lauded for its innovation and forward thinking.
Roll on two decades and things are quite different. The market has boomed with a confusing array of solutions to enable healthcare to go digital. For many radiologists, this has meant dwindling influence and control over radiology IT strategy and implementation, overshadowed by all-encompassing electronic medical record (EMR) implementations, and “enterprise” IT strategy.
Worse still for radiologists, PACS has become a vendor-marketing target to be “integrated,” made “patient-centric,” and (horror of horrors) “deconstructed.” Throw in the onslaught of confusing industry jargon from enterprise imaging vendors — anyone know the difference between a VNA, CAS, or AICA? — and then it’s no surprise the field has been begrudging in a move away from traditional PACS deployment.
There is some good news, however. While industry may preach that the days of PACS are numbered, there are a number of benefits to the new era of enterprise imaging.
This is the opening extract of Steve’s regular monthly market column for AuntMinnie Europe.
To read the full article, please click here.
(Access to the article may require free membership to AuntMinnie Europe – it’s full of great content and insight so well worth it!!)Share on LinkedIn
Imaging IT & Archiving and Management IT – World – 2017July 2017
Imaging IT & Archiving and Management IT – World – 2017
This report is the first component of the our “CCM IT Service”. It provides market estimates for 2015 & 2016 with forecasts for radiology IT, cardiology IT, enterprise imaging, VNA and image exchange to 2021.
Find out more