Why BoB LIS vendors might yet survive EHR’s invasion
Published: May 26, 2022
EHR vendors are increasingly cannibalising clinical departmental IT administration, such as RIS, OIS, and CIS. Best of breed Laboratory Information Systems (BoB-LIS) are often viewed as the next departmental IT lamb headed for slaughter at the altar of the EHR. Is EHR-based LIS therefore a foregone conclusion? Or is there a place still for dedicated BoB-LIS? Based on our latest research assessing the global LIS market, the evidence points to a surprisingly bright future for BoB-LIS.
The COVID Dividend
Unlike some segments in healthcare IT, the LIS market has had a very positive two years. COVID-19 testing directly resulted in a spike in requests for laboratory services and pushed providers to purchase higher volumes of equipment to conduct testing.
For LIS vendors, this resulted first in increased demand for integrations, while also benefitting vendors who had structured pricing around annual testing volumes. This demand continued into 2021, with the worldwide market reporting 8% growth YOY as seen in Figure 1.
Despite some challenges to come near-term, the overall outlook for the market across Signify Research’s forecast remains positive. The requirement for well-equipped labs and greater accessibility and interoperability of data has intensified over the last two years, driving accelerated investment in most regions mid-term.
Figure 1: World Market for LIS Systems
Challenges Still to Overcome
Despite this positive global outlook, the US outlook is less positive. There, bifurcation between EHR-LIS and BoB-LIS, described in Table 1 below, is most apparent.
Table 1: Report Definitions
The advantages of EHR-LIS adoption are clear to providers. EHR vendors offer a comparatively lower price point when combining LIS software with EHR implementations, and this comes with the added advantage of simplifying the hospital IT supply-chain. Consequently, EHR-LIS has cannibalised segments of the US market from BoB-LIS in recent years, resulting in an overall market revenue retraction over the forecast period.
This trend has mostly been limited to the US, where dominating influence of a few EHR vendors has been most pointed. EHR-LIS implementations do, however, come with some trade-off for lower pricing and consolidation, such as a loss in specialisation for workflows and lab types. Therefore, in some markets outside of the US providers have retained preference for BoB-LIS and are predicted to continue to do so over the forecast. Examples include more mature markets like the UK, Netherlands and Nordics, but also emerging regions like Latin America.
Other factors have also slowed EHR-LIS penetration in some markets. These comparatively ‘safe’ markets are either increasingly saturated with low-cost domestic competitors, or about to reach maturation with a rapidly consolidating customer base. Western Europe is a prime example of the latter, whilst markets such as Brazil often start at price points sitting at ~25% of their Western European counterparts.
Facing maturation inertia in some markets, low-cost domestic competition in others and the increasing presence of EHR-LIS driven by C-Suite decision-makers – how do LIS vendors continue to achieve growth and prevent customer attrition?
Option 1: Acquire the Competition
One method of growth that has benefited market leaders in terms of both revenue and customers shares has been acquiring smaller businesses. Dedalus is the prime example of this – having most recently acquired a Germany company (OSM) to solidify its position in the DACH region.
Figure 2: Worldwide LIS Revenue Market Share 2020 (Inner Circle) & 2021 (Outer)
This strategy allows vendors to achieve short-term growth in both revenues and customer bases, as well as sidestepping issues such as customer loyalty and learning unique market characteristics upfront.
However, it is also not without its challenges. When handled incorrectly, acquisitions can lead to difficulty in retaining incumbent workforces, and challenges in assimilation and integration can leave customers dissatisfied and ready to leave established vendors. The more companies that are acquired over a shorter period, the harder these transitions are to manage.
Option 2: Focus on Growing Laboratory Segments
The second option for vendors to pursue growth is to diversify portfolios into wider lab software. There are many different opportunities here, with the most common being genetics-based LIS software or ‘patient engagement’ add-ons. Both these segments within lab services are growing quickly, and therefore present an opportunity for labs to retain the specialisation they are renowned for, whilst also expanding and improving offered services.
Whilst there is a large range of possible lab sub-segments attractive for vendors to pursue, there is some risk. For example, within genetics there is the ever-present threat that existing companies such as Illumina, which dominates its own market, might choose to expand and offer a genetics specific LIS. If current LIS vendors choose to develop in-house solutions, the time taken for development may already see the market saturate before entry if major genomics players gain first mover advantage.
Option 3: Ally with Another Product Sector
The next (and currently least common) method for growth focuses on the growing presence of EHR-LIS deployments. Although these are predicted to grow in number over the forecast, there are opportunities BoB-LIS vendors may choose to capitalise on. There are three prominent examples worth considering:
- EHR/HIS partnership: A&T corporation in Japan had previously partnered with major HIS vendors in the region to sell BoB-LIS into hospitals – an action which has effectively prevented EHR encroachment and allowed the vendor to retain its high market share.
- Leverage other clinical IT portfolio assets: Citadel Health’s entry into the UK market via the acquisition of domestic RIS vendor Wellbeing Software. This provided both an ‘in’ with existing UK hospitals and has allowed the company to win several new contracts recently.
- Leverage wider lab portfolio: Larger reagent and lab equipment providers like Sysmex or Werfen provide LIS bundled with other lab equipment. These vendors are less concerned with the growth of the LIS segments, often offering LIS at comparatively lower price points (like EHR) to secure larger deals, which can act to inhibit growth in markets.
The above examples have worked remarkably well in practice, allowing vendors to capitalise on the trend toward supply chain simplification evident in most healthcare markets. Whilst they do rely somewhat on co-operation and cohesion in sales strategies, this approach has the most promise.
However, we would caution against the practice of discounting software too much within bundled deals, as history shows that often this can lead to poor product development in later years, mitigating the overall value of the product significantly.
Option 4: Diversify Out of Healthcare
The last option open to LIS vendors involves moving outside of healthcare into traditional LIMS environments, i.e. laboratory information management systems used across multiple industries. CliniSys has recently opted to traverse this route with the acquisition of both HORIZON Lab Systems and ApolloLIMS.
This again involves vendors entering an already mature market, and thus entails significant risk. It also does not address EHR encroachment directly and could result in a loss of hospital IT specialisation, as LIMS and LIS often involve separate workflows.
Whilst this may prove beneficial when targeting the private sector, which often has labs involved in several different lab services, it can be argued that the strategy offers no advantages for the hospital segment’s market or providers.
But Will the Lambs Fall Silent?
There clearly remains many options for BoB vendors operating within the laboratory industry, each strategy holding its own risks and merits. It’s not all doom and gloom however, as whilst cost-conscious decision making may have driven cannibalisation in some markets, a final dividend remains from COVID. The pandemic underscored the requirement for top-tier workflows to remain within the healthcare lab, a fact certain to be front and centre in decision maker’s minds for at least the next few years. This may be the lifeline and growth thrust that allows BoB-LIS vendors to establish a stronger foothold and repel EHR-LIS for the long-term outlook.
About the Report
“Laboratory Information Systems – World – 2022” provides a data-centric and global outlook on the current and projected market for laboratory information systems in clinical settings. To find out more, please email the report author Imogen Fitt at Imogen.Fitt@signifyresearch.net.
About Signify Research
Signify Research is an independent supplier of market intelligence and consultancy to the global healthcare technology industry. Our major coverage areas are Healthcare IT, Medical Imaging and Digital Health. Our clients include technology vendors, healthcare providers and payers, management consultants and investors. Signify Research is headquartered in Cranfield, UK. To find out more: email@example.com, T: +44 (0) 1234 436 150, www.signifyresearch.netShare on LinkedIn
Laboratory Information Systems – World – 2022Published May 2022
Laboratory Information Systems – World – 2022
This is Signify Research’s new report on the world Laboratory Information Systems Market published in May 2022.
Find out more