COVID-19 Impact on the Healthcare Technology Market: Pointers from Q1 Financials

Steve Holloway headshot
Steve Holloway
Published: May 13, 2020 In The News

13th May 2020 – Written by Steve Holloway – Featured on HealthTech HotSpot – The ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic is having an enormous impact on the healthcare technology market. While it is too soon to offer a detailed impact analysis of how each product market will react, the substantial financial burden on healthcare providers is certain to reshape the industry in the coming months and years. For example, a recent report from the American Hospital Association (AHA) estimates a total four-month (March to June) financial impact of $202.6 billion in losses for America’s hospitals and health systems, or an average of $50.7 billion per month.

You may also like
Insight
16 Nov 2016: Healthcare IT, Medical Imaging
Analysis of Potential AGFA Takeover by CompuGroup
The biggest positive for CompuGroup Medical is access to an established customer base in Western Europe and the US. CompuGroup’s core market focus and successes have been in Eastern and Central Europe to date, though recent acquisitions have expanded this reach. In contrast, AGFA has spent decades building a strong reputation as a clinical specialist in medical imaging, mostly focused on digital radiography X-ray and imaging IT software. AGFA’s sizeable healthcare customer base would therefore make an attractive target for CompuGroup’s EPR products. In Western Europe, a market relatively immature in EPR adoption, this offer significant growth potential. In contrast, the US market for EPR in hospitals is intensively competitive and dominated by major players such as Epic Systems and Cerner, limiting growth opportunity. However, the large and fragmented ambulatory and outpatient EPR market may be more attractive and could well suit CompuGroup’s products. 2. AGFA agreement would be an “all-in” move on healthcare AGFA’s Healthcare unit accounted for only 41.5% of its $2.6 billion revenue in 2015, with Graphics and Speciality Products making up the remainder. AGFA may well be looking for some assurances on the future of the non-healthcare business lines. However, CompuGroup is a pure healthcare focused company, so the Graphics business is unlikely to be viewed as an essential asset, and could be targeted for potential sell-off. If so, any deal acceptance from AGFA will essentially be an “all-in” move to focus on healthcare, mirroring the recent position taken by Philips, one of its major competitors north of the border. This will be viewed as a risk, given that the AGFA Healthcare business unit revenues have been stagnant in the last few years. However, when viewed in the wider market context, the healthcare sector is already a target for some of the largest technology and IT firms, such as Google, Apple, IBM and Microsoft. This confidence and investment therefore suggest it would be a risk worth taking. 3. Strategic mid- to long-term fit questionable On balance the deal appears more favourable to CompuGroup than AGFA. It offers market access to more mature and profitable markets and will add a strong brand focused on clinical excellence in medical imaging and imaging IT software, providing further credibility to its growing market presence in Europe. However, in context of the wider market, the deal would not solve the biggest strategic challenges for AGFA. As a well-respected mid-sized firm entrenched in medical imaging hardware and software, the focus for AGFA should remain in driving clinical excellence in its core field of diagnostic imaging. Expansion to cover EPR and a new Eastern European customer base could drive some short-term revenue growth for both its software and hardware product lines. However, the joint EPR of an AGFA- CompuGroup deal would unlikely concern the major EPR or enterprise health IT vendors, so over time would offer little in terms of long-term growth potential. Moreover, most market growth and disruption is in the enterprise health platform segment, especially for population health management, analytics platforms and cognitive computing, a challenge for a firm of AGFA’s size to compete in. Instead, AGFA should look to expand its reach within the clinical realm, focusing on applications where its expertise in clinical software and workflow can have most impact, especially in applications relatively new to digitalisation, such as Pathology. It should also look more to associate and partner in provision of new business models, service, cloud technology, cyber security and cognitive computing (much like its recent association with IBM Watson Imaging collaborative). So, unless CompuGroup is willing to pay a premium for AGFA, the likelihood of a deal given the challenge of the Graphics business and poor long-term strategic fit of the healthcare assets is relatively low. Share on LinkedIn Subscribe to our free monthly newsletter with our latest market insights
Arrow Right
Insight
15 Dec 2017: Healthcare IT, Medical Imaging
Philips Acquires Forcare – The Signify View
As discussed in our previous insight (link here) Philips has been highly active in the M&A market in 2017.
Arrow Right
Insight
21 Feb 2019: Healthcare IT, Medical Imaging
HIMSS 2019: Enterprise Imaging Gears Up For Next Stage of Maturity
The HIMSS conference is viewed as a challenging proposition for vendors with an imaging IT focus, given the scale and breadth of healthcare IT solutions on show. It is also a difficult place to launch new products due to the barrage of press releases and media that accompanies the conference. It was no surprise then that big new product releases were relatively thin on the ground for imaging IT. This may be a consequence also of the proximity of HIMSS, sandwiched between the premier radiology conferences of RSNA and ECR
Arrow Right